Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NIO · against 214 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #210 of 215 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including NIO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | NIO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | Not reported | 4.9% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 217 reported | 8.6% | 8.7% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | 7.8% | 33.2% | 10% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 207 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 208 | 15.2B USD | 10 | 57 | |
| 209 | 11.5B EUR (≈$12.7B) | 9 | 28 | |
| 210 | 8.6B USD | 6 | 41 | |
| 210 | 8.0B USD | 6 | 26 | |
| 210 | 7.5B USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 213 | 33.1B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 5 | 42 | |
| 214 | 40.8B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 0 | 31 | |
| 214 | 3.9B EUR (≈$4.3B) | 0 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score