Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National Health Investors, Inc.
How National Health Investors, Inc. stacks up
NHI · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #47 of 180 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including NHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.8% vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 87% of peers. Revenue growth: 23.9% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 23.9% | 5.9% | 87% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 12.8% | 13.9% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 12.0% | 4.8% | 77% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 46 | 54.4B USD | 77 | 57 | |
| 47 | 8.6B USD | 76 | 56 | |
| 47 | 3.0B USD | 76 | 78 | |
| 47 | 4.6B USD | 76 | 66 | |
| 47 | 3.4B USD | 76 | 69 | |
| 51 | 688M USD | 75 | 65 | |
| 52 | 39.2B USD | 74 | 56 | |
| 52 | 1.1B USD | 74 | 84 | |
| 52 | 14.7B USD | 74 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score