Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NGS · against 76 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #39 of 77 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NGS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 74 reported | 1.12× | 0.51× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 74 reported | 0.47 | 0.45 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 78 reported | 2.01× | 1.28× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 35 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 56 | 31 | |
| 36 | 651M USD | 54 | 39 | |
| 37 | 674M USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 38 | 590M USD | 53 | 21 | |
| 39 | 408M USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 40 | 357M AUD (≈$236M) | 51 | 21 | |
| 41 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 50 | 61 | |
| 42 | 428M USD | 47 | 57 | |
| 43 | 755M USD | 46 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score