Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NGL · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #377 of 399 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including NGL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NGL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 63.12× | 0.49× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.66 | 0.48 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.14× | 1.37× | 37% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 373 | 3.1B USD | 7 | 39 | |
| 374 | 318M USD | 6 | 44 | |
| 375 | 942M USD | 6 | 69 | |
| 376 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 59 | |
| 377 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 15 | |
| 378 | 5.9B CAD (≈$4.3B) | 5 | 26 | |
| 379 | 6.7B USD | 5 | 56 | |
| 380 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 5 | 28 | |
| 381 | 4.9B USD | 5 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score