Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NGL · against 123 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #118 of 124 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including NGL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NGL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 122 reported | 63.12× | 0.55× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 121 reported | 0.66 | 0.48 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 123 reported | 1.14× | 1.58× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 114 | 3.8B USD | 8 | 21 | |
| 115 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 7 | 4 | |
| 116 | 3.1B USD | 7 | 39 | |
| 117 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 59 | |
| 118 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 15 | |
| 119 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 34 | |
| 120 | 1.5B USD | 4 | 49 | |
| 121 | 1.8B USD | 3 | 46 | |
| 122 | 1.5B USD | 2 | 12 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score