Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National Grid plc
How National Grid plc stacks up
NGG · against 358 other Utilities companies
Valuation
19/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #290 of 359 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 19?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 8.6%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NGG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 5.2% | 5.0% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 6.5% | 8.6% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | Not reported | -1.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | Not reported | 64.7% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NGG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 286 | 63.9B JPY (≈$435M) | 20 | 52 | |
| 286 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score