Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NFLX · against 7 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 8 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NFLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
| Metric | NFLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 4.6% | 6.4% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 4.9% | 9.1% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 5 reported | 3.8% | 9.0% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 10.4% | 50.7% | 17% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 167.7B USD | 80 | 61 | |
| 2 | 190.2B USD | 74 | 51 | |
| 3 | 179.8B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 4 | 3.79T HKD (≈$484.9B) | 61 | 67 | |
| 5 | 35.96T JPY (≈$244.5B) | 59 | 40 | |
| 6 | 180.9B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 7 | 290.2B USD | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 58 |
| 8 | 23.61T JPY (≈$160.6B) | 27 | 61 |