Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NEE · against 358 other Utilities companies
Ranked #268 of 359 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including NEE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | NEE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 5.3% | 5.0% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 5.0% | 8.6% | 14% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | 1.7% | -1.8% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 32.5% | 64.7% | 11% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 265 | 458.4B BRL (≈$82.5B) | 26 | 30 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 265 |
| 31.4B GBP (≈$40.8B) |
| 26 |
| 47 |
| 265 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 26 | 39 |
| 268 | 147.3B EUR (≈$162.1B) | 25 | 47 |
| 268 | 175.9B USD | 25 | 47 |
| 268 | 44.3B EUR (≈$48.8B) | 25 | 26 |
| 268 | 4.2B USD | 25 | 13 |
| 272 | 4.4B CNY (≈$618M) | 24 | 36 |
| 272 | 58.7B USD | 24 | 39 |