Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NEE · against 7 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 8 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including NEE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | NEE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 5.3% | 4.5% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 5.0% | 7.3% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 6 reported | 1.7% | -1.3% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 32.5% | 33.5% | 29% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92.6B EUR (≈$101.9B) | 64 | 40 | |
| 2 | 98.6B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 3 | 97.0B EUR (≈$106.6B) | 39 | 49 | |
| 4 | 107.8B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 5 | 93.3B USD | 32 | 50 | |
| 6 | 730.6B CNY (≈$102.3B) | 28 | 50 | |
| 7 | 147.3B EUR (≈$162.1B) | 25 | 47 | |
| 7 | 175.9B USD | 25 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score