Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nasdaq, Inc.
How Nasdaq, Inc. stacks up
NDAQ · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #139 of 367 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including NDAQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.7% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 33.9% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NDAQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NDAQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 7.5% | 7.4% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 33.9% | 9.9% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 12.7% | 10.0% | 61% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NDAQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 135 | 6.5B USD | 63 | 48 | |
| 135 | 674M USD | 63 | 53 | |
| 139 | 96.0B USD | 62 | 48 | |
| 139 | 41.9B INR (≈$502M) | 62 | 67 | |
| 139 | 59.8B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 142 | 34.4B CNY (≈$4.8B) | 61 | 40 | |
| 142 | 42.8B USD | 61 | 39 | |
| 142 | 188.7B USD | 61 | 45 | |
| 142 | 16.9B CHF (≈$19.5B) | 61 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score