Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NDAQ · against 23 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #21 of 24 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including NDAQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
| Metric | NDAQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 26 reported | 3.2% | 3.7% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 18 reported | 4.9% | 5.7% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 3.3% | 4.1% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 25 reported | 19.9% | 24.3% | 42% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 93 | 73 | |
| 2 | 43.8B USD | 74 | 57 | |
| 3 | 49.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 4 | 31.1B USD | 53 | 65 | |
| 5 | 46.6B USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 16 | 88.7B USD | 25 | 39 | |
| 18 | 87.2B USD | 24 | 49 | |
| 19 | 70.1B USD | 23 | 45 | |
| 19 | 81.4B USD | 23 | 54 | |
| 21 | 59.8B USD | 21 | 46 | |
| 22 | 46.5B USD | 18 | 44 | |
| 23 | 42.8B USD | 14 | 39 | |
| 24 | 38.4B USD | 12 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score