Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nasdaq, Inc.
How Nasdaq, Inc. stacks up
NDAQ · against 25 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #12 of 26 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including NDAQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.7% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 33.9% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NDAQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NDAQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 26 reported | 7.5% | 10.6% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 26 reported | 33.9% | 23.9% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 12.7% | 11.1% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NDAQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88.7B USD | 84 | 39 | |
| 2 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 75 | 60 | |
| 3 | 81.4B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 4 | 6.04T INR (≈$72.4B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 5 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 69 | 48 | |
| 9 | 70.0B USD | 65 | 53 | |
| 10 | 90.7B USD | 63 | 33 | |
| 10 | 197.1B BRL (≈$35.5B) | 63 | 60 | |
| 12 | 96.0B USD | 62 | 48 | |
| 12 | 59.8B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 14 | 42.8B USD | 61 | 39 | |
| 15 | 43.8B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 15 | 46.5B USD | 60 | 44 | |
| 17 | 46.6B USD | 55 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score