Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NovaBridge Biosciences
How NovaBridge Biosciences stacks up
NBP · against 1,336 other Healthcare companies
Valuation
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #857 of 1,337 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score133 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -19.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.8% vs peer median 0.0%
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NBP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,287 reported | -68.3% | 1.5% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,357 reported | 590.2% | 4.2% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 711 reported | Not reported | -1.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,306 reported | 171.7% | 37.9% | 96% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NBP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 857 | 239M USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 857 | 110M USD | 33 | 54 | |
| 857 | 5.6B USD | 33 | 53 | |
| 857 | 469M USD | 33 | 50 | |
| 857 | 117M USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 857 | 631M USD | 33 | ||
| 857 | 2.2B USD | 33 | 48 | |
| 857 | 276M USD | 33 | 46 | |
| 857 | 455M USD | 33 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score