Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAVN · against 299 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #21 of 300 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including NAVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 289 reported | 0.13× | 0.31× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 283 reported | Not reported | 1.01 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 298 reported | 4.38× | 1.80× | 89% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 17 | 4.1B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 18 | 8.0B USD | 94 | 51 | |
| 19 | 10.7B USD | 93 | 59 | |
| 20 | 9.6B USD | 93 | 75 | |
| 21 | 6.5B USD | 92 | 38 | |
| 22 | 8.3B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 23 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 36 | |
| 24 | 12.2B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 25 | 3.4B USD | 91 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score