Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NATR · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #387 of 802 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NATR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NATR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.13× | 0.44× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.81 | 0.32 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.60× | 1.53× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 383 | 963M USD | 52 | 29 | |
| 384 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 409M USD |
| 52 |
| 37 |
| 385 | 4.7B CNY (≈$661M) | 52 | 44 |
| 386 | 17.2B EUR (≈$18.9B) | 52 | 47 |
| 387 | 212M USD | 52 | 72 |
| 388 | 874.1B JPY (≈$5.9B) | 52 | 48 |
| 389 | 2.7B HKD (≈$350M) | 52 | 60 |
| 390 | 17.8B MXN (≈$959M) | 51 | 64 |
| 391 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 42 |