Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nordic American Tankers Limited
How Nordic American Tankers Limited stacks up
NAT · against 109 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #93 of 110 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.8% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 7.8% | 5.2% | 69% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 8.8% | 12.6% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 7.6% | 4.9% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 30.3% | 59.8% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 1 | 64.6B THB (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 89 | 883M USD | 18 | 42 | |
| 89 | 2.0B USD | 18 | 15 | |
| 89 | 881M USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 92 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 17 | 18 | |
| 93 | 1.6B USD | 16 | 30 | |
| 94 | 2.5B USD | 14 | 31 | |
| 94 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 14 | 20 | |
| 96 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 13 | 38 | |
| 96 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 13 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score