Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAT · against 113 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #46 of 114 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 109 reported | 0.85× | 0.53× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 112 reported | -0.52 | 0.48 | 99% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 113 reported | 3.27× | 1.46× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 42 | 2.8B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 62 | 56 | |
| 43 | 2.2B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 61 | 47 | |
| 44 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 27 | |
| 45 | 2.1B USD | 60 | 58 | |
| 46 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 30 | |
| 47 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 73 | |
| 48 | 15.1B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 58 | 63 | |
| 49 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 56 | 59 | |
| 50 | 58.0B THB (≈$1.6B) | 55 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score