Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAMS · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,175 of 1,217 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score116 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including NAMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | NAMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | -88.9% | 6.1% | 2% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | Not reported | 9.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | -39.7% | 5.8% | 3% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1,175 | 475M USD | 3 | 22 | |
| 1,175 | 888M USD | 3 | 25 | |
| 1,175 | 1.1B USD | 3 | 26 | |
| 1,175 | 215M USD | 3 | 34 | |
| 1,175 | 2.3B USD | 3 | 26 | |
| 1,175 | 2.2B USD | 3 | 20 | |
| 1,187 | 7.1B CNY (≈$993M) | 2 | 27 | |
| 1,187 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 2 | 51 | |
| 1,187 | 110M HKD (≈$14M) | 2 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score