Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAMS · against 372 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #361 of 373 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score30 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including NAMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | NAMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 351 reported | -93.2% | 6.3% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 343 reported | -3432.2% | 8.6% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | -36.7% | 2.1% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 345 reported | -36.8% | 5.2% | 19% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 386 reported | 100.0% | 48.5% | 97% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 361 | 1.7B USD | 3 | 23 | |
| 361 | 3.1B USD | 3 | 27 | |
| 361 | 1.2B USD | 3 | 3 | |
| 361 | 2.4B USD | 3 | 27 | |
| 361 | 2.3B USD | 3 | 26 | |
| 361 | 2.0B USD | 3 | 24 | |
| 367 | 1.7B USD | 2 | 30 | |
| 367 | 1.8B USD | 2 | 23 | |
| 369 | 1.8B USD | 1 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score