Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FRNM · against 1,335 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,290 of 1,336 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score127 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including FRNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | FRNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,226 reported | Not reported | 4.7% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,251 reported | -734.9% | 7.1% | 6% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,315 reported | -0.9% | 1.7% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,252 reported | Not reported | 3.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,394 reported | 0.0% | 45.9% | 3% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1,290 | 35.2B JPY (≈$240M) | 3 | 12 | |
| 1,290 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.7B USD |
| 3 |
| 23 |
| 1,290 | 841M USD | 3 | 33 |
| 1,290 | 3.1B USD | 3 | 27 |
| 1,290 | 1.2B USD | 3 | 3 |
| 1,290 | 2.4B USD | 3 | 27 |
| 1,290 | 454M AUD (≈$299M) | 3 | 7 |
| 1,290 | 2.3B USD | 3 | 26 |
| 1,290 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 3 | 48 |