Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAGE · against 161 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #31 of 162 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including NAGE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAGE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 160 reported | 0.03× | 0.50× | 89% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 162 reported | 2.02 | 0.29 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 166 reported | 6.50× | 1.61× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 5.7B THB (≈$160M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 3 | 1.7B MYR (≈$373M) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.9B CNY (≈$269M) | 98 | 47 | |
| 5 | 1.9B CNY (≈$268M) | 98 | 57 | |
| 27 | 1.6B NOK (≈$154M) | 87 | 33 | |
| 28 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 86 | 70 | |
| 29 | 272M USD | 86 | 47 | |
| 30 | 425M NZD (≈$255M) | 85 | 76 | |
| 31 | 187M USD | 85 | 78 | |
| 32 | 6.6B TWD (≈$205M) | 84 | 41 | |
| 33 | 26.1B INR (≈$314M) | 84 | 52 | |
| 34 | 428M SGD (≈$325M) | 83 | 66 | |
| 35 | 2.2B CNY (≈$308M) | 83 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score