Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to N-able, Inc.
How N-able, Inc. stacks up
NABL · against 593 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #208 of 594 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NABL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NABL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NABL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 583 reported | -0.6% | 2.1% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 602 reported | 5.2% | 4.1% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 180 reported | 6.3% | 2.3% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 588 reported | 84.5% | 36.6% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NABL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 3 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 82.1B JPY (≈$558M) | 98 | 63 | |
| 208 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 62 | 54 | |
| 208 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 62 | 82 | |
| 208 | 135.5B JPY (≈$921M) | 62 | 65 | |
| 208 | 1.3B AUD (≈$854M) | 62 | 55 | |
| 208 | 952M USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 213 | 4.5B CNY (≈$632M) | 61 | 60 | |
| 213 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 61 | 58 | |
| 213 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 61 | 53 | |
| 213 | 8.8B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 61 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score