Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Marzetti Company
How The Marzetti Company stacks up
MZTI · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #81 of 148 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including MZTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.1% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 15.5% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MZTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MZTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 1.1% | 4.1% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 15.5% | 4.5% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 1.9% | 3.5% | 42% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MZTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 77 | 618M USD | 55 | 54 | |
| 78 | 139.6B USD | 54 | 53 | |
| 79 | 2.1B USD | 51 | 42 | |
| 80 | 7.6B USD | 49 | 43 | |
| 81 | 3.0B USD | 48 | 63 | |
| 81 | 35.5B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 83 | 7.2B USD | 46 | 72 | |
| 83 | 1.8B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 85 | 37.1B USD | 45 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score