Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MWA · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #285 of 2,437 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including MWA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MWA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.40× | 0.41× | 51% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.00 | 0.61 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 4.64× | 1.62× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 281 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 89 | 69 | |
| 282 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 544M USD |
| 88 |
| 50 |
| 283 | 2.69T JPY (≈$18.3B) | 88 | 67 |
| 284 | 3.2B USD | 88 | 32 |
| 285 | 3.7B USD | 88 | 78 |
| 286 | 1.3B USD | 88 | 48 |
| 287 | 49.5B JPY (≈$337M) | 88 | 56 |
| 288 | 8.5B ZAR (≈$466M) | 88 | 72 |
| 289 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 88 | 72 |