Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MUR · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #200 of 399 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including MUR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MUR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.42× | 0.49× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.58 | 0.48 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.85× | 1.37× | 20% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 196 | 20.1B USD | 51 | 65 | |
| 197 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.9B USD |
| 51 |
| 29 |
| 198 | 357M AUD (≈$236M) | 51 | 21 |
| 199 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 50 | 61 |
| 200 | 5.7B USD | 50 | 52 |
| 201 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 50 | 31 |
| 202 | 42.1B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 49 | 30 |
| 203 | 6.3B USD | 49 | 53 |
| 204 | 6.4B USD | 49 | 68 |