Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MTW · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,906 of 2,437 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MTW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MTW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.77× | 0.41× | 32% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.75 | 0.61 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 2.11× | 1.62× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,902 | 18.6B SEK (≈$1.9B) | 22 | 36 | |
| 1,903 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.6B AUD (≈$4.4B) |
| 22 |
| 59 |
| 1,904 | 29.9B MYR (≈$6.6B) | 22 | 45 |
| 1,905 | 61.8B INR (≈$741M) | 22 | 52 |
| 1,906 | 858M USD | 22 | 35 |
| 1,907 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 22 | 61 |
| 1,908 | 2.5B USD | 22 | 70 |
| 1,909 | 3.9B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 22 | 59 |
| 1,910 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 22 | 45 |