Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
How The Manitowoc Company, Inc. stacks up
MTW · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #366 of 446 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score42 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including MTW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -55.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 8.9% | 8.4% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -55.8% | 9.2% | 9% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 2.0% | 5.2% | 33% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 363 | 28.8B USD | 28 | 48 | |
| 363 | 357M USD | 28 | 24 | |
| 366 | 41.4B USD | 27 | 27 | |
| 366 | 1.2B USD | 27 | 13 | |
| 366 | 858M USD | 27 | 35 | |
| 366 | 1.7B USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 366 | 12.9B USD | 27 | 60 | |
| 371 | 1.6B USD | 26 | 61 | |
| 371 | 3.5B USD | 26 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score