Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Matrix Service Company
How Matrix Service Company stacks up
MTRX · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
14/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #2,087 of 2,440 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score244 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including MTRX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 14?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 87% of peers. Operating margin: -1.1% vs peer median 7.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 84% of peers. Return on assets: -0.4% vs peer median 3.1%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTRX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTRX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | Not reported | 7.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | -1.1% | 7.7% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | -0.4% | 3.1% | 16% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | -1.8% | 8.0% | 17% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | 7.3% | 25.8% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTRX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.9B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 89 | |
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2,087 | 2.7B CNY (≈$378M) | 14 | 31 | |
| 2,087 | 586M USD | 14 | 59 | |
| 2,087 | 8.2B EUR (≈$9.0B) | 14 | 33 | |
| 2,087 | 849M USD | 14 | 42 | |
| 2,087 | 270M USD | 14 | 41 | |
| 2,087 | 1.9B USD | 14 | 19 | |
| 2,087 | 293M EUR (≈$322M) | 14 | 17 | |
| 2,087 | 147M EUR (≈$161M) | 14 | 18 | |
| 2,087 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 14 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score