Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vail Resorts, Inc.
How Vail Resorts, Inc. stacks up
MTN · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #182 of 356 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MTN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 24.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 2.7% | 5.9% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 24.1% | 6.2% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 5.5% | 4.1% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 180 | 3.9B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 180 | 3.0B USD | 58 | 60 | |
| 182 | 27.4B USD | 57 | 23 | |
| 182 | 364M USD | 57 | 44 | |
| 182 | 5.5B USD | 57 | 36 | |
| 182 | 2.9B USD | 57 | 60 | |
| 182 | 3.7B USD | 57 | 41 | |
| 187 | 5.0B USD | 56 | 58 | |
| 187 | 7.7B USD | 56 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score