Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MTG · against 406 other Banks & Insurance companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #48 of 407 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including MTG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | MTG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 407 reported | 10.9% | 8.1% | 84% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 105 reported | 14.3% | 10.9% | 69% | Context only | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 362 reported | 11.7% | 8.7% | 74% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 82.7% | 72.8% | 66% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unavailable | 98 | ||
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 97 | 64 | |
| 3 | 269M USD | 96 | 90 | |
| 3 | 359M USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 5 | 185M USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 45 | 524M USD | 76 | 80 | |
| 45 | 435M USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 66 |
| 48 | 36.1B USD | 75 | 81 |
| 48 | 2.4B USD | 75 | 89 |
| 48 | 6.0B USD | 75 | 68 |
| 48 | 3.3B USD | 75 | 70 |
| 48 | 31.1B USD | 75 | 82 |
| 48 | 4.9B USD | 75 | 60 |
| 54 | 377M USD | 74 | 61 |