Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMSF · against 917 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #235 of 918 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score92 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AMSF · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | AMSF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 928 reported | 12.1% | 8.1% | 80% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | 20.4% | 10.3% | 81% | Context only | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | 5.1% | 8.1% | 31% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 914 reported | 65.9% | 78.2% | 36% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 235 | 30.3B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 74 | 56 | |
| 235 | 33.7B MYR (≈$7.4B) | 74 | 51 | |
| 235 | 22.4B TWD (≈$695M) | 74 | 58 | |
| 235 | 21.1B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 74 | 61 | |
| 235 | 380M USD | 74 | 61 | |
| 235 | 6.1B USD | 74 | 67 | |
| 235 | 1.8B USD | 74 | 63 | |
| 235 | 6.6B USD | 74 | 85 | |
| 235 | 71.6B USD | 74 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score