Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
How Mettler-Toledo International Inc. stacks up
MTD · against 73 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 74 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including MTD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.2% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 75 reported | 6.9% | 10.0% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 56 reported | 12.2% | 15.7% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 74 reported | 1.5% | 9.0% | 16% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 2 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 3 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 4 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 5 | 138.4B HKD (≈$17.7B) | 91 | 70 | |
| 50 | 21.7B EUR (≈$23.9B) | 49 | 47 | |
| 51 | 49.5B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 51 | 18.5B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 53 | 54.0B USD | 45 | 47 | |
| 53 | 34.0B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 55 | 272.9B BRL (≈$49.1B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 56 | 35.0B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 56 | 33.3B USD | 43 | 24 | |
| 58 | 95.4B AUD (≈$62.9B) | 42 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score