Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alcon Inc.
How Alcon Inc. stacks up
ALC · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #689 of 1,217 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score121 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ALC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 4.9% | 6.1% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | -2.3% | 9.7% | 36% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 6.1% | 5.8% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 689 | 3.5B CNY (≈$496M) | 43 | 38 | |
| 689 | 3.4B TWD (≈$106M) | 43 | 36 | |
| 689 | 254.3B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 689 | 692.7B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 43 | 63 | |
| 689 | 35.0B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 689 | 311.5B THB (≈$8.7B) | 43 | 62 | |
| 689 | 33.3B USD | 43 | 24 | |
| 689 | 4.7B GBP (≈$6.1B) | 43 | 49 | |
| 689 | 4.4B CHF (≈$5.1B) | 43 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score