Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
How Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. stacks up
MTA · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
14/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,130 of 1,321 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score101 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including MTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 14?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 85% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.6% vs peer median 3.6%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.4% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | -0.1% | 3.8% | 23% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 0.7% | 8.6% | 15% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 0.4% | 2.6% | 39% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 38.3% | 61.0% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1,130 | 2.4B CNY (≈$330M) | 14 | 27 | |
| 1,130 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score