Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ArcelorMittal S.A.
How ArcelorMittal S.A. stacks up
MT · against 1,274 other Basic Materials companies
Growth
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #403 of 1,275 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score127 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.4% vs peer median -0.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 88% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 137.7% vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,289 reported | -1.7% | 3.4% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 826 reported | 137.7% | 9.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,263 reported | -8.4% | -0.0% | 22% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 1.4B CAD (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 403 | 2.9B CNY (≈$403M) | 68 | 70 | |
| 403 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 68 | 57 | |
| 403 | 142.1B JPY (≈$966M) | 68 | 78 | |
| 403 | 18.2B SEK (≈$1.8B) | 68 | 55 | |
| 403 | 45.5B USD | 68 | 47 | |
| 403 | 53.7B INR (≈$645M) | 68 | 60 | |
| 403 | 693M SGD (≈$527M) | 68 | 45 | |
| 416 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 67 | 58 | |
| 416 | 16.2B TWD (≈$502M) | 67 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score