Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MSEX · against 358 other Utilities companies
Ranked #297 of 359 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including MSEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | MSEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 4.5% | 5.0% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 6.4% | 8.6% | 21% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | -3.7% | -1.8% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 48.0% | 64.7% | 30% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 293 | 14.2B CAD (≈$10.4B) | 18 | 37 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 293 |
| 8.5B USD |
| 18 |
| 34 |
| 297 | 319M EUR (≈$351M) | 17 | 44 |
| 297 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 17 | 45 |
| 297 | 1.1B USD | 17 | 42 |
| 300 | 32.7B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 16 | 29 |
| 300 | 4.0B CNY (≈$556M) | 16 | 28 |
| 300 | 46.3B THB (≈$1.3B) | 16 | 30 |
| 300 | 26.6B THB (≈$744M) | 16 | 44 |