Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Studio City International Holdings Limited
How Studio City International Holdings Limited stacks up
MSC · against 315 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #184 of 316 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including MSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on assets: -2.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.3% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 68% of peers. Operating margin: 10.1% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 290 reported | 2.3% | 3.5% | 42% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 314 reported | 10.1% | 4.0% | 83% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 304 reported | -2.1% | 2.0% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 299 reported | -10.2% | 4.1% | 16% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 317 reported | 69.3% | 26.3% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 6.9B TWD (≈$214M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 4 | 42.1B JPY (≈$286M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 184 | 973M HKD (≈$125M) | 26 | 49 | |
| 184 | 24.5B JPY (≈$166M) | 26 | 54 | |
| 184 | 568M AUD (≈$375M) | 26 | 35 | |
| 184 | 395M USD | 26 | 40 | |
| 184 | 206M USD | 26 | 45 | |
| 190 | 2.8B CNY (≈$391M) | 25 | 44 | |
| 190 | 2.8B CNY (≈$396M) | 25 | 51 | |
| 190 | 259M CHF (≈$298M) | 25 | 48 | |
| 193 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 24 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score