Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MRVL · against 46 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #23 of 47 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 36
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including MRVL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MRVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 43 reported | 0.29× | 0.39× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 46 reported | 2.26 | 1.25 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 47 reported | 3.17× | 1.57× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 3 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 80 | 74 | |
| 4 | 185.0B USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 5 | 164.9B USD | 78 | 89 | |
| 19 | 89.2B USD | 38 | 59 | |
| 20 | 155.8B USD | 37 | 63 | |
| 21 | 92.1B USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 22 | 94.0B USD | 37 | 61 | |
| 23 | 154.6B USD | 36 | 58 | |
| 24 | 288.7B USD | 35 | 63 | |
| 25 | 203.4B USD | 33 | 61 | |
| 26 | 88.7B USD | 32 | 48 | |
| 27 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 30 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score