Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MRVI · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #783 of 1,373 · scores higher than 43% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including MRVI · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MRVI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.61× | 0.24× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.54 | 0.53 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 4.05× | 2.62× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 779 | 838M EUR (≈$922M) | 43 | 71 | |
| 780 | 472M NZD (≈$283M) |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 43 |
| 63 |
| 781 | 2.2B USD | 43 | 23 |
| 782 | 16.3B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 43 | 49 |
| 783 | 2.8B USD | 43 | 22 |
| 784 | 155.7B USD | 43 | 64 |
| 785 | 166.5B SEK (≈$16.6B) | 43 | 49 |
| 786 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 43 | 34 |
| 787 | 64.3B KRW (≈$46M) | 43 | 24 |