Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
How Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. stacks up
MRSH · against 17 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #7 of 18 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MRSH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 5.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MRSH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MRSH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 4.0% | 3.7% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 14 reported | 6.6% | 5.9% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 16 reported | 4.9% | 3.9% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 15.6% | 23.6% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MRSH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 128.0B USD | 76 | 61 | |
| 2 | 49.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 3 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 4 | 70.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 5 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 43 | 60 | |
| 6 | 96.0B USD | 38 | 48 | |
| 7 | 97.2B USD | 35 | 44 | |
| 8 | 137.4B USD | 32 | 50 | |
| 9 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 30 | 48 | |
| 10 | 141.3B USD | 29 | 52 | |
| 11 | 188.7B USD | 28 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score