Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Everspin Technologies, Inc.
How Everspin Technologies, Inc. stacks up
MRAM · against 484 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #409 of 485 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score77 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including MRAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: -25.5% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 90% of peers. Operating margin: -15.5% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on assets: -2.9% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MRAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MRAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 445 reported | -25.5% | 2.7% | 10% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 479 reported | -15.5% | 3.2% | 16% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 475 reported | -2.9% | 1.1% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 462 reported | -3.8% | 3.3% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 485 reported | 52.3% | 27.2% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MRAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 409 | 18.3B TWD (≈$569M) | 9 | 18 | |
| 409 | 2.5B CNY (≈$347M) | 9 | 36 | |
| 409 | 210M USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 409 | 532M USD | 9 | 25 | |
| 409 | 330M USD | 9 | 33 | |
| 409 | 183M USD | 9 | 29 | |
| 417 | 1.8B CNY (≈$255M) | 8 | 22 | |
| 417 | 8.6B TWD (≈$267M) | 8 | 23 | |
| 417 | 4.4B CNY (≈$610M) | 8 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score