Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
How JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. stacks up
JKS · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,546 of 1,708 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score163 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including JKS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -65.5% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 89% of peers. Operating margin: -13.6% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -3.7% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JKS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JKS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | -65.5% | 6.8% | 3% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | -13.6% | 6.3% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | -3.7% | 2.9% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 4.8% | 33.4% | 6% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JKS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1,546 | 2.5B CNY (≈$347M) | 9 | 36 | |
| 1,546 | 2.1B USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 1,546 | 210M USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 1,546 | 3.5B USD | 9 | 50 | |
| 1,546 | 532M USD | 9 | 25 | |
| 1,546 | 330M USD | 9 | 33 | |
| 1,546 | 5.8B USD | 9 | 27 | |
| 1,546 | 183M USD | 9 | 29 | |
| 1,546 | 772M USD | 9 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score