Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hello Group Inc.
How Hello Group Inc. stacks up
MOMO · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 471 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including MOMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 24.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 23.0% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MOMO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MOMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 23.0% | 3.0% | 97% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | Not reported | 8.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 24.3% | 7.6% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 257.6% | 48.9% | 93% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MOMO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 18 | 906.5B KRW (≈$653M) | 96 | 47 | |
| 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score