Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Moog Inc.
How Moog Inc. stacks up
MOG-A · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #263 of 473 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score89 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MOG-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MOG-A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MOG-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 3.3% | 3.0% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 5.0% | 6.3% | 36% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.1% | 3.3% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 19.4% | 32.3% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MOG-A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 255 | 74.4B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 263 | 286.8B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 263 | 79.3B USD | 40 | 50 | |
| 263 | 1.2B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 263 | 11.4B USD | 40 | 64 | |
| 263 | 1.1B USD | 40 | 73 | |
| 263 | 76.6B USD | 40 | 42 | |
| 263 | 721M USD | 40 | 60 | |
| 263 | 47.7B USD | 40 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score