Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Altria Group, Inc.
How Altria Group, Inc. stacks up
MO · against 149 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #60 of 150 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.1% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.4% vs peer median 8.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.2% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 6.2% | 3.7% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 10.5% | 9.0% | 62% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 7.1% | 5.8% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | -2.1% | 39.9% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 2 | 212M USD | 93 | 72 | |
| 2 | 843M USD | 93 | 88 | |
| 4 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 67 | |
| 57 | 983M USD | 54 | 35 | |
| 58 | 2.1B USD | 53 | 42 | |
| 58 | 139.6B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 60 | 7.6B USD | 52 | 43 | |
| 60 | 128.5B USD | 52 | 46 | |
| 62 | 187.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 63 | 34.7B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 63 | 35.5B USD | 49 | 40 | |
| 65 | 3.7B USD | 48 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score