Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monster Beverage Corporation
How Monster Beverage Corporation stacks up
MNST · against 19 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 20 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MNST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 34.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 91% of peers. Revenue growth: 20.4% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 20.4% | 3.8% | 89% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 34.8% | 21.9% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 11.3% | 3.2% | 89% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.6B EUR (≈$79.8B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 503.8B HKD (≈$64.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 92.4B USD | 90 | 73 | |
| 4 | 47.3B USD | 88 | 47 | |
| 5 | 717.6B BRL (≈$129.2B) | 78 | 59 | |
| 5 | 130.9B USD | 78 | 61 | |
| 7 | 49.0B USD | 70 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score