Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monro, Inc.
How Monro, Inc. stacks up
MNRO · against 520 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #178 of 521 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MNRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 17.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 509 reported | 1.9% | 3.2% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 533 reported | 9.7% | 8.3% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 2.8% | 7.1% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 512 reported | 160.2% | 67.4% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 178 | 4.1B NOK (≈$393M) | 66 | 33 | |
| 178 | 544M USD | 66 | 50 | |
| 178 | 293M USD | 66 | 89 | |
| 178 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 66 | 38 | |
| 178 | 364M USD | 66 | 44 | |
| 178 | 499M USD | 66 | 72 | |
| 178 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 66 | 82 | |
| 187 | 104.9B JPY (≈$713M) | 65 | 61 | |
| 187 | 364M EUR (≈$400M) | 65 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score