Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Maximus, Inc.
How Maximus, Inc. stacks up
MMS · against 554 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #63 of 555 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score61 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including MMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.6% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.8% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 550 reported | 10.3% | 4.4% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 561 reported | 13.6% | 7.9% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 205 reported | 12.6% | 4.3% | 93% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 551 reported | 50.8% | 42.4% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 63 | 16.5B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 86 | 85 | |
| 63 | 13.3B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 86 | 64 | |
| 63 | 489.9B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 86 | 63 | |
| 63 | 18.4B SEK (≈$1.8B) | 86 | 55 | |
| 63 | 3.4B USD | 86 | 66 | |
| 63 | 1.72T CLP (≈$1.9B) | 86 | 57 | |
| 71 | 28.8B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 85 | 69 | |
| 71 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 85 | 89 | |
| 71 | 374.2B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 85 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score