Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Maximus, Inc.
How Maximus, Inc. stacks up
MMS · against 559 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #359 of 560 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score67 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including MMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 26.2% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 561 reported | -3.3% | 6.9% | 14% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 473 reported | 26.2% | 8.7% | 72% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 555 reported | 2.9% | 6.4% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 352 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 352 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 359 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 359 | 5.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 359 | 3.4B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 359 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 44 | 57 | |
| 363 | 4.2B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 363 | 93.6B THB (≈$2.6B) | 43 | 39 | |
| 363 | 215.4B INR (≈$2.6B) | 43 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score