Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
How Marcus & Millichap, Inc. stacks up
MMI · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #151 of 731 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including MMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 75% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 11.9% | 3.0% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | -3.5% | 3.8% | 26% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 144 | 708M USD | 80 | 58 | |
| 151 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 79 | 68 | |
| 151 | 13.4B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 79 | 45 | |
| 151 | 536M USD | 79 | 65 | |
| 151 | 1.1B USD | 79 | 50 | |
| 151 | 5.6B USD | 79 | 56 | |
| 151 | 592M CAD (≈$432M) | 79 | 61 | |
| 151 | 104M EUR (≈$115M) | 79 | 42 | |
| 158 | 1.5B HKD (≈$194M) | 78 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score